Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2007/082/117

    Case F-138/06: Action brought on 18 December 2006 — Meister v OHIM

    IO C 82, 14.4.2007, p. 55–56 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    14.4.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 82/55

    Action brought on 18 December 2006 — Meister v OHIM

    (Case F-138/06)

    (2007/C 82/117)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Herbert Meister (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: Hans-Joachim Zimmermann)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market

    Form of order sought

    —

    annul the implied decision of rejection by the President of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 18 September 2006 taken under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations;

    —

    in the alternative, annul the implied decision of rejection by the President of OHIM of 18 September 2006 taken under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations and the written decision of rejection by the President of OHIM of 20 September 2006 (dated 18 September 2006);

    —

    in the further alternative, annul the written decision of the President of OHIM of 20 September 2006 which was based on Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations;

    —

    in the alternative, annul the communication of OHIM of 9 June 2006 entitled ‘definitive Promotion Points 2006’;

    —

    in the alternative, annul the implied decision of rejection by the President of OHIM of 27 November 2006;

    —

    order OHIM to pay the applicant an appropriate amount of up to one year's salary, but not less than EUR 45 000;

    —

    order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The applicant is an official of OHIM in Alicante, Spain, and complains about the reports which the defendant has to submit about him every two years, which, he claims, are substantively incorrect and are flawed and have not been produced on numerous occasions. Accordingly, the applicant seeks annulment of all the defendant's implied decisions taken on the basis of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations and the amendment of the promotion points granted erroneously by the defendant to him in 2006.

    The applicant also claims that, by unlawfully infringing Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations in his regard for years, the defendant has intentionally and immorally disregarded his rights as an employee. He thus seeks damage for non-material harm from the defendant on the grounds of physical harassment and continuous infringement of his personal rights.

    Top