This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/056/77
Case F-55/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 25 January 2007 — de Albuquerque v Commission (Officials — Reassignment — Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of equal treatment — Abuse of power — Interest of the service)
Case F-55/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 25 January 2007 — de Albuquerque v Commission (Officials — Reassignment — Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of equal treatment — Abuse of power — Interest of the service)
Case F-55/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 25 January 2007 — de Albuquerque v Commission (Officials — Reassignment — Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of equal treatment — Abuse of power — Interest of the service)
IO C 56, 10.3.2007, p. 41–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
10.3.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 56/41 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 25 January 2007 — de Albuquerque v Commission
(Case F-55/06) (1)
(Officials - Reassignment - Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of equal treatment - Abuse of power - Interest of the service)
(2007/C 56/77)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Augusto de Albuquerque (Woluwé-St-Étienne, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and K. Herrmann, Agents)
Re:
Annulment of the decision of the Appointing Authority of 2 February 2006 dismissing the claim brought by the applicant against the decision of 23 September 2005 of the Director-General of DG INFSO to transfer the applicant in the interest of the service as head of unit INFSO.G.2 ‘Micro and nanosystems’.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action. |
2. |
Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
(1) OJ C 154 of 1.7.2006, p. 28.