This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/326/47
Case C-436/05: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Lucien de Graaf, Gudula Daniels v Belgian State (Preliminary references — Inadmissibility)
Case C-436/05: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Lucien de Graaf, Gudula Daniels v Belgian State (Preliminary references — Inadmissibility)
Case C-436/05: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Lucien de Graaf, Gudula Daniels v Belgian State (Preliminary references — Inadmissibility)
IO C 326, 30.12.2006, p. 24–24
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
30.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 326/24 |
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Lucien de Graaf, Gudula Daniels v Belgian State
(Case C-436/05) (1)
(Preliminary references - Inadmissibility)
(2006/C 326/47)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Hof van beroep te Antwerpen
Parties
Applicants: Lucien de Graaf, Gudula Daniels
Defendant: Belgian State
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Interpretation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996 (OJ 1997 L 28, p. 1) — Material scope — Whether applicable or not to a supplementary crisis contribution levied by a Member State to finance its social security system — Obligation to pay the contribution even where a person is liable to pay contributions to a social security system other than that of the State of residence — Whether compatible with Article 39 EC
Operative part of the order
The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen, by decision of 29 November 2005, is inadmissible.