Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document C2005/106/77

Case T-84/05: Action brought on 17 February 2005 by Nicole Schmit against the Commission of the European Communities

IO C 106, 30.4.2005, p. 38–39 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

30.4.2005   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/38

Action brought on 17 February 2005 by Nicole Schmit against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-84/05)

(2005/C 106/77)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 17 February 2005 by Nicole Schmit, residing in Ispra (Italy), represented by Eric Boigelot, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

order the production of all files concerning the applicant and sealed by OLAF;

—

order the production of the report which concludes the internal investigation into the applicant;

—

annul the investigation into the applicant;

—

annul the Note from OLAF containing ‘notification of the investigation and the information of the Italian judicial authorities’;

—

annul the investigation report sent to the Italian judicial authorities;

—

annul any measure arising from and/or relating to those decisions which may be taken subsequently to the bringing of this action;

—

order OLAF and the Commission to pay damages, assessed on an equitable basis at EUR 30 000, subject to increase and/or decrease in the course of the proceedings;

—

in any event, order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of her action, the applicant puts forward pleas identical to those put forward by the applicants in Case T-22/05.

Top