Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2005/069/28

    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 January 2005 in Case T-387/03: Proteome Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Word mark BIOKNOWLEDGE — Absolute grounds for refusal — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Descriptive sign)

    IO C 69, 19.3.2005, p. 14–15 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    19.3.2005   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 69/14


    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

    of 19 January 2005

    in Case T-387/03: Proteome Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Word mark BIOKNOWLEDGE - Absolute grounds for refusal - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Descriptive sign)

    (2005/C 69/28)

    Language of the case: English

    In Case T-387/03: Proteome Inc., established at Beverly, Massachusetts (United States), represented by M. Edenborough, Barrister, C. Jones, A. Brodie and C. Loweth, Solicitors, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: P. Bullock and S. Laitinen) — action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 25 August 2003 (Case R 0707/2002-4), and the examiner's decision of 21 June 2002 refusing registration of the word mark BIOKNOWLEDGE — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President, M. Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has given a judgment on 19 January 2005, in which it:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders the applicant to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 21 of 24.1.2004.


    Top