EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2004/228/94

Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 June 2004 in Case T-96/03: Manuel Camós Grau v Commission of the European Communities (Investigation of the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) concerning the management and financing of the Institute for European-Latin American Relations — Possible conflict of interests with regard to an investigator — Decision to remove the investigator from the team — Action for annulment — Preparatory measures — Inadmissible)

IO C 228, 11.9.2004, p. 41–41 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

11.9.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/41


ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 June 2004

in Case T-96/03: Manuel Camós Grau v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Investigation of the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) concerning the management and financing of the Institute for European-Latin American Relations - Possible conflict of interests with regard to an investigator - Decision to remove the investigator from the team - Action for annulment - Preparatory measures - Inadmissible)

(2004/C 228/94)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-96/03: Manuel Camós Grau, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by M.-A. Lucas, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: initially H. van Lier, then J.-F. Pasquier and C. Ladenburger, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for, first, annulment of the decision of the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) of 17 May 2002 to remove one of the investigators from the investigation concerning the Institute for European-Latin American relations in order to avoid any apparent conflict of interests, without annulling the measures adopted by that investigator, and also the decision implicitly rejecting the applicant's complaint of 29 July 2002 against that decision and, second, damages by way of compensation for the non-material damage and damage to his career allegedly sustained as a consequence of those decisions — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, and V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 9 June 2004, in which it:

1.

Dismisses the application as inadmissible;

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.


(1)  OJ C 112 of 10.5.2003.


Top