Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CN0407

    Case C-407/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 2 July 2021 — Union fédérale des consommateurs — Que choisir (UFC — Que choisir), Consommation, logement et cadre de vie (CLCV) v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance

    IO C 357, 6.9.2021, p. 14–15 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.9.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 357/14


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 2 July 2021 — Union fédérale des consommateurs — Que choisir (UFC — Que choisir), Consommation, logement et cadre de vie (CLCV) v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance

    (Case C-407/21)

    (2021/C 357/18)

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Conseil d’État

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicants: Union fédérale des consommateurs — Que choisir (UFC — Que choisir), Consommation, logement et cadre de vie (CLCV)

    Defendants: Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance

    Questions referred

    1

    Must Article 12 of the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 (1) on package travel and linked travel arrangements be interpreted as obliging the organiser of package travel, in the event of termination of the contract, to refund in cash the full amount of any payments made for the package, or as authorising an equivalent refund, in particular in the form of a credit note for an amount equal to the amount of any payments made?

    2

    If it is the case that those refunds refer to a cash refund, are the health crisis related to the COVID-19 epidemic and its effects on travel operators, which have suffered as a result of that crisis a fall in their turnover estimated at between 50 and 80 % and represent more than 7 % of France’s gross domestic product and, in the case of package tour operators, have 30 000 employees in France and a turnover of nearly EUR 11 billion, capable of justifying and, if so, under what conditions and subject to what limitations, a temporary derogation from the obligation for the organiser to refund to the traveller the full amount of any payments made for the package within a period of 14 days following the termination of the contract, laid down in Article 12(4) of the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements?

    3

    If the answer to the previous question is in the negative, is it possible, in the circumstances mentioned above, to adjust the temporal effects of a decision annulling national legislation which is contrary to Article 12(4) of the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements?


    (1)  Directive (EU) 2015/2302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC (OJ 2015 L 326, p. 1).


    Top