Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CN0355

    Case C-355/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 7 June 2021 — Procter & Gamble International Operations SA v Perfumesco.pl sp. z o.o., sp. k.

    IO C 357, 6.9.2021, p. 8–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.9.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 357/8


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 7 June 2021 — Procter & Gamble International Operations SA v Perfumesco.pl sp. z o.o., sp. k.

    (Case C-355/21)

    (2021/C 357/10)

    Language of the case: Polish

    Referring court

    Sąd Najwyższy

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Procter & Gamble International Operations SA

    Defendant: Perfumesco.pl sp. z o.o., sp. k.

    Question referred

    Must Article 10 of Directive 2004/48/EC on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (1) be interpreted as precluding the interpretation of a provision of national law to the effect that a protection measure in the form of destruction of goods relates only to goods illegally manufactured or illegally marked, and cannot be applied to goods illegally put on the market in the territory of the European Economic Area which cannot be found to have been illegally manufactured or illegally marked?


    (1)  Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45, Special edition in Polish: Chapter 17 Volume 002 P. 32 — 39).


    Top