Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62020TN0353

    Case T-353/20: Action brought on 3 June 2020 — AC Milan v EUIPO — InterES (ACM 1899 AC MILAN)

    IO C 262, 10.8.2020, p. 32–32 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    10.8.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 262/32

    Action brought on 3 June 2020 — AC Milan v EUIPO — InterES (ACM 1899 AC MILAN)

    (Case T-353/20)

    (2020/C 262/43)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Associazione Calcio Milan SpA (AC Milan) (Milan, Italy) (represented by: A. Perani and G. Ghisletti, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: InterES Handels- und Dienstleistungs Gesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (Nuremberg, Germany)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

    Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark ACM 1899 AC MILAN in red, black and white — International registration designating the European Union No 1 329 545

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 February 2020 in Case R 161/2019-2

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order EUIPO to bear the fees and costs incurred by the applicant in the present proceeding.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 10(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

    —

    Infringement of Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top