Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020TN0161

    Case T-161/20: Action brought on 27 March 2020 — Ighoga Region 10 v Commission

    IO C 175, 25.5.2020, p. 33–33 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.5.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 175/33


    Action brought on 27 March 2020 — Ighoga Region 10 v Commission

    (Case T-161/20)

    (2020/C 175/43)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Ighoga Region 10 eV (Ingolstadt, Germany) (represented by: A. Bartosch, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should declare that the defendant infringed its obligations under the TFEU in that, even after almost 2 ¾ years have elapsed since the complaint has been lodged and, following the request to adopt a final decision to close the procedure, the defendant did not take a formal decision in accordance with one of the possible alternatives set out in Article 4 of the Rules of Procedure in State aid cases, but rather failed to act.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The action is brought against the Commission’s failure to act in connection with the adoption of a decision concerning the applicant’s complaint of 4 July 2017 on EU State aid in case SA.48582 — presumed State aid for Maritim-Gruppe and KHI Immobilien GmbH.


    Top