Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019TA0371

    Case T-371/19: Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2020 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO — Save the Duck (FAKE DUCK) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark FAKE DUCK — Earlier EU figurative mark FAKE DUCK — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Relevant public — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    IO C 371, 3.11.2020, p. 9–10 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    3.11.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 371/9


    Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2020 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO — Save the Duck (FAKE DUCK)

    (Case T-371/19) (1)

    (European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark FAKE DUCK - Earlier EU figurative mark FAKE DUCK - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Relevant public - Similarity of the goods and services - Similarity of the signs - Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    (2020/C 371/07)

    Language of the case: Italian

    Parties

    Applicant: Itinerant Show Room Srl (San Giorgio in Bosco, Italy) (represented by: A. Visentin, M. Cartella and B. Cartella, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Save the Duck SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. De Vietro, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 April 2019 (Case R 1117/2018-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Forest Srl and Itinerant Show Room.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2.

    Orders Itinerant Show Room to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 263, 5.8.2019.


    Top