EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CA0310
Case C-310/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — Boudewijn Schokker v European Union Aviation Safety Agency (Appeal — Civil service — Contract staff — Recruitment procedure — Classification in grade — Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — Article 86 — European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) — General implementing provisions — Challenge of the proposed classification — Withdrawal of the offer of employment — Action for compensation — Principle of sound administration — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Breach of administrative duty — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Non-material damage — Compensation)
Case C-310/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — Boudewijn Schokker v European Union Aviation Safety Agency (Appeal — Civil service — Contract staff — Recruitment procedure — Classification in grade — Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — Article 86 — European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) — General implementing provisions — Challenge of the proposed classification — Withdrawal of the offer of employment — Action for compensation — Principle of sound administration — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Breach of administrative duty — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Non-material damage — Compensation)
Case C-310/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — Boudewijn Schokker v European Union Aviation Safety Agency (Appeal — Civil service — Contract staff — Recruitment procedure — Classification in grade — Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — Article 86 — European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) — General implementing provisions — Challenge of the proposed classification — Withdrawal of the offer of employment — Action for compensation — Principle of sound administration — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Breach of administrative duty — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Non-material damage — Compensation)
IO C 262, 10.8.2020, p. 7–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.8.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 262/7 |
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — Boudewijn Schokker v European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(Case C-310/19 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil service - Contract staff - Recruitment procedure - Classification in grade - Conditions of Employment of Other Servants - Article 86 - European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) - General implementing provisions - Challenge of the proposed classification - Withdrawal of the offer of employment - Action for compensation - Principle of sound administration - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff - Breach of administrative duty - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Non-material damage - Compensation)
(2020/C 262/10)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Boudewijn Schokker (represented by: T. Martin and S. Orlandi, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Aviation Safety Agency (represented by: S. Rostren, acting as Agent, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, avocats)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the order of the General Court of the European Union of 8 February 2019, Schokker v EASA (T-817/17, not published, EU:T:2019:74); |
|
2. |
Orders the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to pay compensation in the sum of EUR 7 500 to Mr Boudewijn Schokker; |
|
3. |
Orders the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to pay its own costs relating to the proceedings at first instance in Case T-817/17 and the appeal proceedings as well as those incurred by Mr Boudewijn Schokker relating to both those proceedings. |