This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TJ0628
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#Viomichania mpiskoton kai eidon diatrofis E.I. Papadopoulos SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union figurative mark fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre — Earlier EU figurative mark Caprice — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-628/18.
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.
Viomichania mpiskoton kai eidon diatrofis E.I. Papadopoulos SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union figurative mark fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre — Earlier EU figurative mark Caprice — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-628/18.
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.
Viomichania mpiskoton kai eidon diatrofis E.I. Papadopoulos SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union figurative mark fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre — Earlier EU figurative mark Caprice — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-628/18.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2019:750