Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TN0625

    Case T-625/17: Action brought on 15 September 2017 — Vallina Fonseca v SRB

    IO C 374, 6.11.2017, p. 47–47 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.11.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 374/47


    Action brought on 15 September 2017 — Vallina Fonseca v SRB

    (Case T-625/17)

    (2017/C 374/70)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: José Antonio Vallina Fonseca (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and A. Sellés Marco, lawyers)

    Defendant: Single Resolution Board

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the General Court should:

    Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017, concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, S.A.;

    Order the SRB to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.


    Top