EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TB0725
Case T-725/16: Order of the General Court of 27 March 2017 — Palos Caravina v CdT (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Officials — Recruitment — Communication of information concerning the appointment of a third party — Third paragraph of Article 25 of the Staff Regulations — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-725/16: Order of the General Court of 27 March 2017 — Palos Caravina v CdT (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Officials — Recruitment — Communication of information concerning the appointment of a third party — Third paragraph of Article 25 of the Staff Regulations — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-725/16: Order of the General Court of 27 March 2017 — Palos Caravina v CdT (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Officials — Recruitment — Communication of information concerning the appointment of a third party — Third paragraph of Article 25 of the Staff Regulations — No need to adjudicate)
IO C 178, 6.6.2017, p. 21–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.6.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 178/21 |
Order of the General Court of 27 March 2017 — Palos Caravina v CdT
(Case T-725/16) (1)
((Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Officials - Recruitment - Communication of information concerning the appointment of a third party - Third paragraph of Article 25 of the Staff Regulations - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 178/29)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Maria José Palos Caravina (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Salerno and P. Singer, lawyers)
Defendant: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (represented by: M. Garnier and J. Rikkert, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking annulment of, first, the CdT’s decision of 23 December 2015 refusing to provide the applicant with information concerning the appointment of a third party and, second, the CdT’s decision of 5 July 2016 rejecting the complaint brought by the applicant against that refusal.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the present action. |
|
2. |
The Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Maria José Palos Caravina. |