This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TB0618
Case T-618/16: Order of the General Court of 24 April 2017 — Dreimane v Commission (Action for annulment and compensation — Civil service — Officials — Pensions — Transfer of national pension rights — Calculation of years of pensionable service — Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations — Time-limit — Inadmissibility)
Case T-618/16: Order of the General Court of 24 April 2017 — Dreimane v Commission (Action for annulment and compensation — Civil service — Officials — Pensions — Transfer of national pension rights — Calculation of years of pensionable service — Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations — Time-limit — Inadmissibility)
Case T-618/16: Order of the General Court of 24 April 2017 — Dreimane v Commission (Action for annulment and compensation — Civil service — Officials — Pensions — Transfer of national pension rights — Calculation of years of pensionable service — Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations — Time-limit — Inadmissibility)
IO C 202, 26.6.2017, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.6.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 202/19 |
Order of the General Court of 24 April 2017 — Dreimane v Commission
(Case T-618/16) (1)
((Action for annulment and compensation - Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Transfer of national pension rights - Calculation of years of pensionable service - Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations - Time-limit - Inadmissibility))
(2017/C 202/33)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Sandra Dreimane (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Ābiks, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the Commission decision fixing the number of additional pensionable years to be taken into account in the pension scheme of the EU institutions following the applicant’s request to transfer pension rights acquired before she entered the service of the European Union, and, second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the Commission’s failure to act within a reasonable period in the processing of that transfer request.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
|
2. |
There is no need to rule on the application to intervene submitted by the Council of the European Union. |
|
3. |
Ms Sandra Dreimane shall bear her own costs and also pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
(1) OJ C 371, 10.10.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-48/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).