This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0615
Case T-615/16: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2018 — PD v EIB (Civil service — Personnel of the EIB — Psychological harassment — Total and permanent disability — Application for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease — Action brought before the closure of the procedure for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease — Inadmissibility)
Case T-615/16: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2018 — PD v EIB (Civil service — Personnel of the EIB — Psychological harassment — Total and permanent disability — Application for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease — Action brought before the closure of the procedure for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease — Inadmissibility)
Case T-615/16: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2018 — PD v EIB (Civil service — Personnel of the EIB — Psychological harassment — Total and permanent disability — Application for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease — Action brought before the closure of the procedure for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease — Inadmissibility)
IO C 427, 26.11.2018, p. 45–45
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.11.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 427/45 |
Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2018 — PD v EIB
(Case T-615/16) (1)
(Civil service - Personnel of the EIB - Psychological harassment - Total and permanent disability - Application for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease - Action brought before the closure of the procedure for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease - Inadmissibility)
(2018/C 427/56)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: PD (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: B. Maréchal, lawyer)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: T. Gilliams and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Re:
Action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, in essence, an order that the EIB compensate the applicant for the harm which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of psychological harassment at the hands of his line manager and the failure on the part of the EIB to take appropriate measures to address that situation and to protect his health.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action as being inadmissible; |
|
2. |
Orders PD and the European Investment Bank (EIB) to bear their own costs. |
(1) OJ C 371, 10.10.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-45/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).