This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0233
Case T-233/16: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2017 — Ruiz Molina v EUIPO (Appeal — Civil Service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause ending the contract if the staff member’s name is not included on the reserve list of the next open competition — Termination of the contract by application of the termination clause — Reclassification of a fixed-term contract as a contract of unlimited duration — Res judicata — Clause 5(1) of the Framework Agreement on fixed- term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-233/16: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2017 — Ruiz Molina v EUIPO (Appeal — Civil Service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause ending the contract if the staff member’s name is not included on the reserve list of the next open competition — Termination of the contract by application of the termination clause — Reclassification of a fixed-term contract as a contract of unlimited duration — Res judicata — Clause 5(1) of the Framework Agreement on fixed- term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-233/16: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2017 — Ruiz Molina v EUIPO (Appeal — Civil Service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause ending the contract if the staff member’s name is not included on the reserve list of the next open competition — Termination of the contract by application of the termination clause — Reclassification of a fixed-term contract as a contract of unlimited duration — Res judicata — Clause 5(1) of the Framework Agreement on fixed- term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Obligation to state reasons)
IO C 269, 14.8.2017, p. 15–15
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
14.8.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 269/15 |
Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2017 — Ruiz Molina v EUIPO
(Case T-233/16) (1)
((Appeal - Civil Service - Members of the temporary staff - Fixed-term contract with a termination clause ending the contract if the staff member’s name is not included on the reserve list of the next open competition - Termination of the contract by application of the termination clause - Reclassification of a fixed-term contract as a contract of unlimited duration - Res judicata - Clause 5(1) of the Framework Agreement on fixed- term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Obligation to state reasons))
(2017/C 269/20)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: José Luis Ruiz Molina (San Juan de Alicante, Spain) (represented by: N. Lhoëst and S. Michiels, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2016, Ruiz Molina v OHMI (F 60/15, EU:F:2016:28) seeking to have that judgment set aside.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr José Luis Ruiz Molina to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in the appeal. |