Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016CN0583

    Case C-583/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Versailles (France) lodged on 17 November 2016 — Green Yellow Canet en Roussillon SNC v Enedis, SA

    IO C 38, 6.2.2017, p. 10–11 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.2.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 38/10


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Versailles (France) lodged on 17 November 2016 — Green Yellow Canet en Roussillon SNC v Enedis, SA

    (Case C-583/16)

    (2017/C 038/13)

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Cour d’appel de Versailles

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Green Yellow Canet en Roussillon SNC

    Defendant: Enedis, SA

    Questions referred

    1.

    Must Article 107(1) TFEU be interpreted as meaning that the obligation to purchase the electricity generated by plants which use solar radiation energy at a price higher than the market price, that is financed by all final consumers of electricity, as it results from the Ministerial Orders of 10 July 2006 (JORF No 171 of 26 July 2006, p. 11133) and 12 January 2010 (JORF No 0011 of 14 January 2010, p. 727) fixing the conditions for purchasing that electricity, read in conjunction with Law No 2000-108 of 10 February 2000 on the modernisation and development of the public electricity service, Decree No 2000-1196 of 6 December 2000 and Decree No 2001-410 of 10 May 2001, constitutes State aid?

    2.

    If so, must Article 108(3) TFEU be interpreted as meaning that the failure to notify the European Commission of that mechanism beforehand affects the validity of the abovementioned Orders giving effect to the aid at issue?


    Top