EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015TB0439

Case T-439/15: Order of the General Court of 11 March 2016 — Amrita and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Agriculture — Protective measures against pests of plants — Measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)

IO C 156, 2.5.2016, p. 47–47 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

2.5.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/47


Order of the General Court of 11 March 2016 — Amrita and Others v Commission

(Case T-439/15) (1)

((Action for annulment - Agriculture - Protective measures against pests of plants - Measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 156/63)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Amrita Sarl (Scorrano, Italy) and the 28 other applicants whose names are included in the Annex to the order (represented by: L. Paccione and V. Stamerra, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and I. Galindo Martín, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 of 18 May 2015 as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.) (OJ 15 L 125, p. 3), where appropriate after having declined to apply Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community (OJ 2000 L 169, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1.

The action is dismissed.

2.

Amrita Sarl and the 28 other applicants whose names are included in the Annex are ordered to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 328, 5.10.2015.


Top