Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015TB0069

    Case T-69/15: Order of the General Court of 16 July 2015 — NK Rosneft and Others v Council (Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Lis pendens — Manifest inadmissibility)

    IO C 337, 12.10.2015, p. 12–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    12.10.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 337/12


    Order of the General Court of 16 July 2015 — NK Rosneft and Others v Council

    (Case T-69/15) (1)

    ((Action for annulment - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Lis pendens - Manifest inadmissibility))

    (2015/C 337/15)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicants: NK Rosneft OAO (Moscow, Russia); RN-Shelf-Arctic OOO (Moscow); RN-Shelf-Dalniy Vostok ZAO (Yuzhniy-Sakhalin, Russia); RN-Exploration OOO (Moscow); and Tagulskoe OOO (Krasnoyarsk, Russia) (represented by: T. Beazley QC)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Boelaert and B. Driessen, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application for partial annulment of Council Decision 2014/872/CFSP of 4 December 2014 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, and Decision 2014/659/CFSP amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP (OJ 2014 L 349, p. 58), and Council Regulation (EU) No 1290/2014 of 4 December 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, and amending Regulation (EU) No 960/2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 (OJ 2014 L 349, p. 20), in so far as those acts concern the applicants.

    Operative part of the order

    1)

    The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

    2)

    NK Rosneft OAO, RN-Shelf-Arctic OOO, RN-Shelf-Dalniy Vostok ZAO, RN-Exploration OOO and Tagulskoe OOO shall bear their own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.


    Top