This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TA0121
Case T-121/15: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Fortischem v Commission (State aid — Chemical industry — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Concept of State aid — State resources — Advantage — Recovery — Economic continuity — Principle of sound administration — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-121/15: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Fortischem v Commission (State aid — Chemical industry — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Concept of State aid — State resources — Advantage — Recovery — Economic continuity — Principle of sound administration — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-121/15: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Fortischem v Commission (State aid — Chemical industry — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Concept of State aid — State resources — Advantage — Recovery — Economic continuity — Principle of sound administration — Obligation to state reasons)
IO C 423, 16.12.2019, p. 31–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.12.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 423/31 |
Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Fortischem v Commission
(Case T-121/15) (1)
(State aid - Chemical industry - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Concept of State aid - State resources - Advantage - Recovery - Economic continuity - Principle of sound administration - Obligation to state reasons)
(2019/C 423/38)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Fortischem a.s. (Nováky, Slovakia) (represented by: C. Arhold, P. Hodál and M. Staroň, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati and G. Conte, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: AlzChem AG (Trostberg, Germany) (represented initially by P. Alexiadis, Solicitor, A. Borsos and I. Georgiopoulos, lawyers, and subsequently by P. Alexiadis, A. Borsos and V. Dolka, lawyers)
Re:
Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Articles 1 and 3 to 5 of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1826 of 15 October 2014 on the State aid SA.33797 — (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (ex 2011/CP) implemented by Slovakia for NCHZ (OJ 2015 L 269, p. 71).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Fortischem a.s. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
|
3. |
Orders AlzChem AG to bear its own costs. |