EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CN0396
Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 21 May 2015 in Case T-145/14: adidas AG/Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 21 May 2015 in Case T-145/14: adidas AG/Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 21 May 2015 in Case T-145/14: adidas AG/Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
IO C 118, 4.4.2016, p. 2–2
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
4.4.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 118/2 |
Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 21 May 2015 in Case T-145/14: adidas AG/Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
(Case C-396/15 P)
(2016/C 118/02)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Shoe Branding Europe BVBA (represented by: J. Løje, lawyer)
Other parties to the proceedings: adidas AG, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
By order of 17 February 2016 the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.