This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0767
Case T-767/14: Action brought on 17 November 2014 — Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn v CPVO — Artevos and Dachverband Kulturpflanzen- und Nutztiervielfalt (Oksana)
Case T-767/14: Action brought on 17 November 2014 — Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn v CPVO — Artevos and Dachverband Kulturpflanzen- und Nutztiervielfalt (Oksana)
Case T-767/14: Action brought on 17 November 2014 — Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn v CPVO — Artevos and Dachverband Kulturpflanzen- und Nutztiervielfalt (Oksana)
IO C 46, 9.2.2015, p. 53–54
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
9.2.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 46/53 |
Action brought on 17 November 2014 — Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn v CPVO — Artevos and Dachverband Kulturpflanzen- und Nutztiervielfalt (Oksana)
(Case T-767/14)
(2015/C 046/69)
Language in which the application was lodged: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn BV (Uden, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Jonker, lawyer)
Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Artevos GmbH (Karlsruhe, Germany) and Dachverband Kulturpflanzen- und Nutztiervielfalt eV (Bielefeld, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before the CPVO
Applicant for Community plant variety right: applicant
Community plant variety right at issue: Oksana — application No 2005/1046
Contested decision: decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 2 July 2014 in Case A 007/2013
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the contested decision; |
— |
consequently, uphold the applicant’s appeal against decisions R 1232, OBJ 13-086, OBJ 13-087, OBJ 13-088 and OBJ 13-090 of the CPVO, find that the applicant’s variety is (sufficiently) new within the meaning of Article 10 of Regulation No 2100/94 and grant a Community plant variety right for the applicant’s variety; |
— |
order the CPVO and the other parties to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
— |
infringement of Articles 10 and 76 of Regulation No 2100/94. |