Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62014TN0605

    Case T-605/14: Action brought on 11 August 2014  — Drex Technologies v Council

    IO C 361, 13.10.2014, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    13.10.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 361/22

    Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Drex Technologies v Council

    (Case T-605/14)

    2014/C 361/33

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Drex Technologies SA (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Cornet d’Elzius, lawyers)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    declare its action to be both admissible and well founded;

    —

    consequently, annul Decision 2014/309/CFSP of 28 May 2014 and the subsequent measures implementing it in so far as they concern the applicant;

    —

    order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those raised in Case T-432/11 Makhlouf v Council  (1).

    (1)  OJ C 290, p. 13.

    Top