EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0028
Case T-28/14: Action brought on 14 January 2014 — José Manuel Baena Grupo v OHIM — Neuman and Galdeano del Sel (Representation of a seated figure)
Case T-28/14: Action brought on 14 January 2014 — José Manuel Baena Grupo v OHIM — Neuman and Galdeano del Sel (Representation of a seated figure)
Case T-28/14: Action brought on 14 January 2014 — José Manuel Baena Grupo v OHIM — Neuman and Galdeano del Sel (Representation of a seated figure)
IO C 78, 15.3.2014, p. 14–14
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
15.3.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 78/14 |
Action brought on 14 January 2014 — José Manuel Baena Grupo v OHIM — Neuman and Galdeano del Sel (Representation of a seated figure)
(Case T-28/14)
2014/C 78/28
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: José Manuel Baena Grupo, SA (Santa Perpètua de Mogoda, Spain) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Herbert Neuman and Andoni Galdeano del Sel (Tarifa, Spain)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul OHIM’s decision; |
— |
order OHIM to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Registered Community design No 426 895-002 for ‘T-shirts (Ornamentation for); Caps (Ornamentation for); Stickers (Ornamentation for); Printed matter, including advertising materials (Ornamentation for)’.
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Applicant
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Herbert Neuman and Andoni Galdeano del Sel
Mark or design of the applicant for the declaration of invalidity: Community figurative mark No 1 312 651, for goods in Classes 25, 28, and 32 of the Nice Classification.
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Application upheld and design declared invalid
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed in part
Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation of Regulation No 6/2002