Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014CN0148

    Case C-148/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 31 March 2014  — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Nordzucker AG

    IO C 235, 21.7.2014, p. 2–3 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.7.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 235/2


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 31 March 2014 — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Nordzucker AG

    (Case C-148/14)

    2014/C 235/03

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Bundesverwaltungsgericht

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

    Respondent: Nordzucker AG

    Additional party: Der Vertreter des Bundesinteresses beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht

    Question referred

    Must Article 16(3) and (4) of Directive 2003/87/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that the excess emissions penalty must also be applied in the case where an operator has, by 30 April of a given year, surrendered a number of allowances corresponding to the total emissions stated in its report on emissions from the installation for the preceding year, and that report has been assessed as satisfactory by the verifier, but where the competent authority, after 30 April, has established that the verified emissions report had erred by understating the total quantity of emissions, the report was duly corrected and the operator surrendered the additional allowances within the new period for surrender?


    (1)  Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32).


    Top