Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014CA0031

Case C-31/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 December 2014  — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Kessel medintim GmbH, formerly Kessel Marketing & Vertriebs GmbH, Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Appeal — Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the word mark Premeno — Opposition from the proprietor of the earlier national word mark Pramino — Limitation of the goods designated in the Community trade mark application — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 43(1))

IO C 46, 9.2.2015, p. 16–16 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

9.2.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/16


Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 December 2014 — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Kessel medintim GmbH, formerly Kessel Marketing & Vertriebs GmbH, Janssen-Cilag GmbH

(Case C-31/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the word mark Premeno - Opposition from the proprietor of the earlier national word mark Pramino - Limitation of the goods designated in the Community trade mark application - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 43(1)))

(2015/C 046/21)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings: Kessel medintim GmbH, formerly Kessel Marketing & Vertriebs GmbH (represented by: A. Jacob, Rechtsanwalt), Janssen-Cilag GmbH (represented by: M. Wenz, Rechtsanwältin)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

2.

Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to pay the costs;

3.

Declares that Janssen-Cilag GmbH is to bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.


Top