Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TN0674

    Case T-674/13: Action brought on 18 December 2013 — Gugler France v OHIM — Gugler (GUGLER)

    IO C 61, 1.3.2014, p. 13–14 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    1.3.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 61/13


    Action brought on 18 December 2013 — Gugler France v OHIM — Gugler (GUGLER)

    (Case T-674/13)

    2014/C 61/23

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Gugler France SA (Besançon, France) (represented by: A. Grolée, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Alexander Gugler (Maxdorf, Germany)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 October 2013 given in Case R 356/2012-4;

    Cancel the contested trade mark;

    Order the defendant and the other party, should it intervene, to bear the costs of proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The figurative mark ‘GUGLER’ for goods and services in Classes 6, 17, 19, 22, 37, 39 and 42 — Community trade mark registration No 3 324 902

    Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

    Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The grounds were those laid down in Article 52(1)(b) and 53(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 8(4) CTMR

    Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the contested Community trade mark invalid

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) and 53(1)(c) CTMR


    Top