This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TN0267
Case T-267/13: Action brought on 17 May 2013 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Gaffashion (BAUSS)
Case T-267/13: Action brought on 17 May 2013 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Gaffashion (BAUSS)
Case T-267/13: Action brought on 17 May 2013 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Gaffashion (BAUSS)
IO C 215, 27.7.2013, p. 14–15
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
IO C 215, 27.7.2013, p. 8–8
(HR)
|
27.7.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 215/14 |
Action brought on 17 May 2013 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Gaffashion (BAUSS)
(Case T-267/13)
2013/C 215/19
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Seijo Veiguela and J. L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gaffashion — Comércio de Acessórios de Moda, Lda (Viana do Castelo, Portugal)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
|
— |
annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 February 2013 in Case R 2295/2011-2, in so far as, by dismissing the appeal brought by the applicant, it upheld the decision of the Opposition Division to grant in part the Community trade mark No 9 093 733‘BAUSS’ (word); |
|
— |
order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Gaffashion — Comércio de Acessórios de Moda, Lda
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘BAUSS’ for goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 9 093 733
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative marks with word elements ‘BASS 3 TRES’, ‘BASS 10 DIEZ’ and ‘BASS 20 VEINTE’ for goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 35
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009