Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62013CN0075

    Case C-75/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 14 February 2013 — SEK Zollagentur GmbH v Hauptzollamt Gießen

    IO C 147, 25.5.2013, p. 8–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.5.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 147/8

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 14 February 2013 — SEK Zollagentur GmbH v Hauptzollamt Gießen

    (Case C-75/13)

    2013/C 147/13

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Bundesfinanzhof

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: SEK Zollagentur GmbH

    Defendant: Hauptzollamt Gießen

    Questions referred

    1.

    Are the relevant provisions of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, (1) in particular Article 50 thereof, to be interpreted as meaning that an article left with a person by the customs authority for temporary storage in an approved place is deemed to have been removed from customs supervision if it is declared for an external transit procedure, but it does not in fact accompany the prepared transit papers on the transport planned and is not presented to the customs office at the place of destination?

    2.

    If the answer to the first question is affirmative: In such circumstances is the person who, as the approved consignor, placed the goods in the transit procedure a customs debtor under the first indent of Article 203(3) of the Customs Code or under the fourth indent of Article 203(3) of the Customs Code?

    (1)  OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1.

    Top