Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012TA0147

    Case T-147/12: Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2013 — Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International v Commission (Customs union — Imports of preserved mushrooms from China — Decision finding no justification for the remission of import duties — Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Detectable error on the part of the customs authorities — Obvious negligence on the part of the importer — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Sound administration — Equal treatment)

    IO C 377, 21.12.2013, p. 13–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.12.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 377/13


    Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2013 — Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International v Commission

    (Case T-147/12) (1)

    (Customs union - Imports of preserved mushrooms from China - Decision finding no justification for the remission of import duties - Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Detectable error on the part of the customs authorities - Obvious negligence on the part of the importer - Legitimate expectations - Proportionality - Sound administration - Equal treatment)

    2013/C 377/30

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International mbH & Co KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: K. Landry and G. Schwendinger, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Keppenne and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2011) 6393 final of 16 September 2011 determining that remission of import duties was not justified in a particular case

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International mbH & Co KG to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.


    Top