EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012CB0173
Case C-173/12 P: Order of the Court of 17 January 2013 — Verenigde Douaneagenten BVv European Commission (Appeal — Article 220(2) of the Customs Code — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Incorrect presentation of the facts — Import of raw cane sugar)
Case C-173/12 P: Order of the Court of 17 January 2013 — Verenigde Douaneagenten BVv European Commission (Appeal — Article 220(2) of the Customs Code — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Incorrect presentation of the facts — Import of raw cane sugar)
Case C-173/12 P: Order of the Court of 17 January 2013 — Verenigde Douaneagenten BVv European Commission (Appeal — Article 220(2) of the Customs Code — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Incorrect presentation of the facts — Import of raw cane sugar)
IO C 108, 13.4.2013, p. 10–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
13.4.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 108/10 |
Order of the Court of 17 January 2013 — Verenigde Douaneagenten BVv European Commission
(Case C-173/12 P) (1)
(Appeal - Article 220(2) of the Customs Code - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Incorrect presentation of the facts - Import of raw cane sugar)
2013/C 108/20
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Appellant: Verenigde Douaneagenten BV (represented by: S. Moolenaar, advocaat)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Burggraaf and L. Keppenne, Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 February 2012 in Case T-32/11 Verenigde Douaneagenten v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed in part the application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 6754 final of 1 October 2010 finding that there should be post clearance recovery of import duties and that remission of those duties is not justified in a particular case (REC 02/09)
Operative part of the order
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
2. |
Verenigde Douaneagenten BV are ordered to pay costs. |