Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012CA0058

    Case C-58/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 November 2013 — Groupe Gascogne SA v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Cartels — Industrial plastic bags sector — Whether the infringement by a subsidiary may be attributed to the parent company — Taking into account the total turnover of the group in order to calculate the upper limit of the fine — Excessive length of the proceedings before the General Court — Principle of effective legal protection)

    IO C 39, 8.2.2014, p. 3–3 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    8.2.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 39/3


    Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 November 2013 — Groupe Gascogne SA v European Commission

    (Case C-58/12 P) (1)

    (Appeal - Competition - Cartels - Industrial plastic bags sector - Whether the infringement by a subsidiary may be attributed to the parent company - Taking into account the total turnover of the group in order to calculate the upper limit of the fine - Excessive length of the proceedings before the General Court - Principle of effective legal protection)

    2014/C 39/04

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Appellant: Groupe Gascogne SA (represented by: P. Hubert and E. Durand, avocats)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and N. von Lingen, Agents)

    Re:

    Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 November 2011 in Case T-72/06 Groupe Gascogne v Commission, by which that court dismissed the application for annulment in part and variation of Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 (EC) (Case COMP/F/38.354 — Industrial bags) concerning a cartel in the industrial plastic bags sector, and an application to vary that decision.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2.

    Orders Groupe Gascogne SA to pay the costs of this appeal.


    (1)  OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.


    Top