Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62011TN0656

    Case T-656/11: Action brought on 29 December 2011 — Morison Menon Chartered Accountants and Others v Council

    IO C 58, 25.2.2012, p. 14–14 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.2.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 58/14

    Action brought on 29 December 2011 — Morison Menon Chartered Accountants and Others v Council

    (Case T-656/11)

    2012/C 58/26

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicants: Morison Menon Chartered Accountants (Dubai, United Arab Emirates); Morison Menon Chartered Accountants — Dubai Office (Dubai); and Morison Menon Chartered Accountants — Sharjah Office (Sharjah, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: H. Viaene, T. Ruys and D. Gillet, lawyers)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (1) and Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (2) insofar as they concern the applicants;

    —

    Order the Council to pay the costs incurred by the applicants, as well as its own.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of their action, the applicants rely on three pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging

    —

    an infringement of the duty to state reasons on the part of the Council, as well as the applicants’ rights of defence, in particular the right to be heard and to an effective judicial remedy;

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging

    —

    a manifest error of assessment on the part of the Council;

    3.

    Third plea in law, alleging

    —

    an infringement of the right to property.

    (1)  OJ L 319, 2.12.2011, p. 11

    (2)  OJ L 319, 2.12.2011, p. 71

    Top