Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011TA0666

    Case T-666/11: Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2013 — Budziewska v OHIM — Puma (Bounding feline) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a bounding feline — Earlier designs — Ground for invalidity — Lack of individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Overall impression not different — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

    IO C 377, 21.12.2013, p. 13–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.12.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 377/13


    Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2013 — Budziewska v OHIM — Puma (Bounding feline)

    (Case T-666/11) (1)

    (Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a bounding feline - Earlier designs - Ground for invalidity - Lack of individual character - Informed user - Degree of freedom of the designer - Overall impression not different - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

    2013/C 377/29

    Language of the case: Polish

    Parties

    Applicant: Danuta Budziewska (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: J. Masłowski, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2011 (Case R 1137/2010-3) relating to invalidity proceedings between Puma AG Rudolf Dassler Sport and Danuta Budziewska.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Danuta Budziewska to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.


    Top