EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011CN0400

Case C-400/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 28 July 2011 — Josef Egbringhoff v Stadtwerke Ahaus GmbH

IO C 311, 22.10.2011, p. 18–19 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

22.10.2011   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/18


Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 28 July 2011 — Josef Egbringhoff v Stadtwerke Ahaus GmbH

(Case C-400/11)

2011/C 311/30

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Josef Egbringhoff

Defendant: Stadtwerke Ahaus GmbH

Question referred

Is Article 3(5) of, in conjunction with point (b) and/or (c) of Annex A to, Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules (1) for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC to be interpreted as meaning that a provision of national law on price variations in electricity delivery contracts with domestic customers, who are supplied electricity within the framework of the general duty to supply (standard-rate customers), satisfies the transparency requirements if, in that provision, the grounds, preconditions and scope of the price variation are not stipulated but customers are assured that electricity suppliers will give them sufficient advance notice of any price increases and they have the right to terminate the contract if they are unwilling to accept the amended contractual terms and conditions as communicated?


(1)  Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC — Statements made with regard to decommissioning and waste management activities (OJ 2003 L 176, p. 37).


Top