EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TJ0585
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 May 2012. # Aitic Penteo, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PENTEO - Earlier Benelux and international word marks XENTEO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009. # Case T-585/10.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 May 2012.
Aitic Penteo, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PENTEO - Earlier Benelux and international word marks XENTEO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-585/10.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 May 2012.
Aitic Penteo, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PENTEO - Earlier Benelux and international word marks XENTEO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-585/10.
Thuarascálacha na Cúirte Eorpaí 2012 -00000
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2012:251
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 May 2012 —
Aitic Penteo v OHIM — Atos Worldline (PENTEO)
(Case T‑585/10)
Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PENTEO — Earlier Benelux and international word marks XENTEO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009
Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 51, 74)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Chamber of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2010 (Case R 774/2010‑1) relating to opposition proceedings between Atos Worldline SA and Aitic Penteo, SA. |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Aitic Penteo, SA to pay the costs. |