Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62010FN0121

    Case F-121/10: Action brought on 19 November 2010 — Heath v ECB

    IO C 30, 29.1.2011, p. 67–67 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    29.1.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 30/67

    Action brought on 19 November 2010 — Heath v ECB

    (Case F-121/10)

    ()

    2011/C 30/133

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Michael Heath (Southampton, United Kingdom) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Central Bank

    Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

    Annulment of the applicant's pension slips for the month of January 2010 and the following months, in so far as these apply a pension increase of 0,6 % following the pensions adjustment procedure for 2010, and damages for loss suffered by the applicant.

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul the salary slip for January 2010 and the following months, in so far as these apply a pension increase of 0,6 %, in order to apply an increase of 2,1 % calculated in accordance with a lawful GSA [General Salary Adjustment];

    —

    to the extent necessary, annul the decisions rejecting the requests for reconsideration and the complaints lodged by the applicant, decisions of 11 May 2010 and 9 September 2010 respectively;

    —

    order the defendant to pay the difference between the pension increase of 0,6 % granted unlawfully to the applicant as from January 2010 and that of 2,1 % to which he should have been entitled, namely a salary increase of 1,5 % per month as from January 2010. Those amounts should have interest applied as from their respective due dates until the date of actual payment, calculated on the basis of the rate set by the European Central Bank for main refinancing operations, applicable during the relevant period, plus 2 points;

    —

    order the defendant to pay EUR 5 000, to compensate for the applicant's material damage resulting from the loss in his purchasing power;

    —

    order the defendant to pay EUR 5 000, assessed ex aequo et bono to compensate for his non-material damage;

    —

    order the ECB to pay the costs.
    Top