EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009TB0102
Case T-102/09: Order of the General Court of 1 September 2011 — Elosta v Commission (Action for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Out of time — No force majeure — No excusable error — Inadmissibility)
Case T-102/09: Order of the General Court of 1 September 2011 — Elosta v Commission (Action for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Out of time — No force majeure — No excusable error — Inadmissibility)
Case T-102/09: Order of the General Court of 1 September 2011 — Elosta v Commission (Action for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Out of time — No force majeure — No excusable error — Inadmissibility)
IO C 319, 29.10.2011, p. 20–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
29.10.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 319/20 |
Order of the General Court of 1 September 2011 — Elosta v Commission
(Case T-102/09) (1)
(Action for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Out of time - No force majeure - No excusable error - Inadmissibility)
2011/C 319/41
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Abdelrazag Elosta (Pinner, Middlesex, United Kingdom) (represented by: E. Grieves and A. McMurdie, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Paasivirta and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Szostak, G. Étienne, M.-M. Josephides and E. Finnegan, Agents
Re:
Application for the annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1330/2008 of 22 December 2008 amending for the 103rd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban (OJ 2002 L 345, p. 60), in so far as it concerns the applicant.
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
2. |
Abdelrazag Elosta is ordered to pay his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |
3. |
The Council of the European Union is ordered to pay its own costs. |