Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008TN0193

    Case T-193/08 P: Appeal brought on 21 May 2008 by Carina Skareby against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 6 March 2008 in Case F-46/06, Skareby v Commission

    IO C 197, 2.8.2008, p. 26–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    2.8.2008   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 197/26

    Appeal brought on 21 May 2008 by Carina Skareby against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 6 March 2008 in Case F-46/06, Skareby v Commission

    (Case T-193/08 P)

    (2008/C 197/47)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Appellant: Carina Skareby (Leuven, Belgium) (represented by S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

    Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities

    Form of order sought by the appellant

    —

    set aside the judgment delivered on 6 March 2008 by the European Union Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-46/06;

    —

    uphold the claims seeking annulment and damages put forward by the appellant before the Civil Service Tribunal;

    —

    order the Commission to pay the costs of both cases.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    By this appeal, the appellant requests the Court to set aside the judgment delivered by the Civil Service Tribunal on 6 March 2008 in Case F-46/06 Skareby v Commission, which dismissed her action for, first, annulment of her career development report for 2004 and, second, damages.

    In support of her appeal, the appellant puts forward two pleas, alleging manifest errors of assessment (paragraphs 66, 98 and 113 of the contested judgment) and distortion of the clear sense of evidence (paragraph 68).

    Top