This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TJ0064
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 July 2010. # Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche SpA v European Commission. # State aid - Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest - Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Concept of advantage - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Aid measure put into effect. # Case T-64/08.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 July 2010.
Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche SpA v European Commission.
State aid - Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest - Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Concept of advantage - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Aid measure put into effect.
Case T-64/08.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 July 2010.
Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche SpA v European Commission.
State aid - Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest - Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Concept of advantage - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Aid measure put into effect.
Case T-64/08.
Thuarascálacha na Cúirte Eorpaí 2010 II-00125*
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2010:270
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 July 2010 – Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche v Commission
(Case T-64/08)
State aid – Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest – Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery – Concept of advantage – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations – Aid measure put into effect
1. State aid – Concept – Compensation awarded for expropriation of assets – Not included (Art. 87(1) EC) (see paras 57, 60, 63, 72, 74, 99, 101)
2. State aid – Examination by the Commission – Administrative procedure – Obligation on the Commission to put the parties concerned on notice to submit their observations – Right of the aid beneficiary to be sufficiently associated with the proceedings – Limits (Art. 88(2) EC) (see paras 161-163, 166-168)
3. EU Law – Principles – Rights of the defence – Whether applicable to administrative procedures initiated by the Commission – Examination of plans to grant aid – Scope (Art. 88(2) EC) (see para. 189)
4. State aid – Planned aid – Notification to the Commission – Scope of the obligation – Need to notify aid measures at the draft stage (Art. 88(3) EC; Council Regulation No 659/1999, Arts 2 and 3) (see paras 228-230, 234-236)
5. State aid – Commission decision finding aid unlawful and ordering its recovery – Aid not yet paid (Art. 88(3) EC; Council Regulation No 659/1999, Art. 14(1)) (see paras 239, 241, 250-251)
6. State aid – Recovery of unlawful aid – Aid granted in breach of the procedural rules of Article 88 EC – Possible legitimate expectation on the part of the beneficiaries – Protection – Conditions and limits (Art. 88 EC; Council Regulation No 659/1999, Art. 14(1)) (see paras 269-271, 275-276)
7. State aid – Commission decision not to raise objections to a national measure – Legitimate expectation of the beneficiary that an extension of the said measure is lawful – None (Art. 88 EC; Council Regulation No 659/1999, Art. 14(1)) (see paras 283-284, 288)
Re:
APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision 2008/408/EC of 20 November 2007 on the State aid C 36/A/06 (ex NN 38/06) implemented by Italy in favour of ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche (OJ 2008 L 144, p. 37). |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche SpA to pay the costs. |