EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008FB0001
Case F-1/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2008 — Nijs v Court of Auditors (Staff Case — Officials — Article 35(1)(e) of the Rules of Procedure — Statement of pleas and arguments — Time-limit for complaints — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case F-1/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2008 — Nijs v Court of Auditors (Staff Case — Officials — Article 35(1)(e) of the Rules of Procedure — Statement of pleas and arguments — Time-limit for complaints — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case F-1/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2008 — Nijs v Court of Auditors (Staff Case — Officials — Article 35(1)(e) of the Rules of Procedure — Statement of pleas and arguments — Time-limit for complaints — Manifest inadmissibility)
IO C 209, 15.8.2008, p. 72–73
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
15.8.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 209/72 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2008 — Nijs v Court of Auditors
(Case F-1/08) (1)
(Staff Case - Officials - Article 35(1)(e) of the Rules of Procedure - Statement of pleas and arguments - Time-limit for complaints - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2008/C 209/133)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)
Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Communities (represented by: T. Kennedy, J.-M. Stenier and G. Corstens, Agents)
Re:
First, annulment of the decision of the Appeals Committee not to promote the applicant to Grade A*11 pursuant to the 2005 promotion year and, second, a claim for damages.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as partly manifestly inadmissible and partly manifestly unfounded. |
|
2. |
Mr Nijs is ordered to pay all the costs. |