This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008CO0268
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 March 2009. # Christos Michail v Commission of the European Communities. # Appeal - Staff case - Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations - Psychological harassment - Duty to provide assistance - Distortion of facts - Errors in the legal assessment of the facts. # Case C-268/08 P.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 March 2009.
Christos Michail v Commission of the European Communities.
Appeal - Staff case - Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations - Psychological harassment - Duty to provide assistance - Distortion of facts - Errors in the legal assessment of the facts.
Case C-268/08 P.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 March 2009.
Christos Michail v Commission of the European Communities.
Appeal - Staff case - Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations - Psychological harassment - Duty to provide assistance - Distortion of facts - Errors in the legal assessment of the facts.
Case C-268/08 P.
Tuarascálacha na Cúirte Eorpaí – Cásanna Foirne 2009 II-B-2-00051
Thuarascálacha na Cúirte Eorpaí 2009 I-00023*;FP-I-B-2-00005
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2009:122
ORDER OF THE COURT (Eighth Chamber)
3 March 2009
Case C-268/08 P
Christos Michail
v
Commission of the European Communities
(Appeal – Civil service – Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment – Duty to provide assistance – Distortion of facts – Errors in the legal assessment of the facts)
Appeal: against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 16 April 2008 in Case T‑486/04 Michail v Commission by which that court dismissed the appellant’s action for annulment of the Commission’s implied rejection of 20 March 2004 of the appellant’s application for assistance under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations. Infringement of Article 12 of the Staff Regulations. Psychological harassment. Distortion of the facts. Errors in the legal classification of the facts
Held: The appeal is dismissed. Mr Michail is ordered to pay the costs.
Summary
Appeals – Grounds – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the Court of First Instance – Error of law relied on not identified – Inadmissible
(Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1), first para., (c))