This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007TB0365
Case T-365/07: Order of the General Court of 12 December 2011 — Traxdata France v OHIM — Ritrax (TRAXDATA, TEAM TRAXDATA) (Trade mark — Action for annulment — Applicant’s failure to proceed — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-365/07: Order of the General Court of 12 December 2011 — Traxdata France v OHIM — Ritrax (TRAXDATA, TEAM TRAXDATA) (Trade mark — Action for annulment — Applicant’s failure to proceed — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-365/07: Order of the General Court of 12 December 2011 — Traxdata France v OHIM — Ritrax (TRAXDATA, TEAM TRAXDATA) (Trade mark — Action for annulment — Applicant’s failure to proceed — No need to adjudicate)
IO C 39, 11.2.2012, p. 13–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
11.2.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 39/13 |
Order of the General Court of 12 December 2011 — Traxdata France v OHIM — Ritrax (TRAXDATA, TEAM TRAXDATA)
(Case T-365/07) (1)
(Trade mark - Action for annulment - Applicant’s failure to proceed - No need to adjudicate)
(2012/C 39/24)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Traxdata France SARL (Paris, France) (represented initially by F. Valentin, B. Amaudric du Chaffaut and G. Courtois, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Ritrax Corporation Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M.H. Blair, M.J. Gilbert, S.S. Malynicz and C.A.N. Balme, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 May 2007 (Joined Cases R 1337/2005-1, R 1338/2005-1, R 1339/2005-1 and R 1340/2005-1), concerning invalidity proceedings between Ritrax Corporation Ltd and Traxdata France SARL.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no need to adjudicate on this action. |
|
2. |
Traxdata France SARL is ordered to pay the costs. |