This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007TA0473
Case T-473/07 P: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 April 2009 — Commission v Berrisford (Appeal — Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2005 promotion procedure — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Examination of comparative merits — Obligation to take into account the fact that the official concerned was included in the reserve)
Case T-473/07 P: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 April 2009 — Commission v Berrisford (Appeal — Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2005 promotion procedure — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Examination of comparative merits — Obligation to take into account the fact that the official concerned was included in the reserve)
Case T-473/07 P: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 April 2009 — Commission v Berrisford (Appeal — Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2005 promotion procedure — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Examination of comparative merits — Obligation to take into account the fact that the official concerned was included in the reserve)
IO C 129, 6.6.2009, p. 13–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
6.6.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 129/13 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 April 2009 — Commission v Berrisford
(Case T-473/07 P) (1)
(Appeal - Staff cases - Officials - Promotion - 2005 promotion procedure - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Examination of comparative merits - Obligation to take into account the fact that the official concerned was included in the reserve)
2009/C 129/22
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: Michael Berrisford (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 10 October 2007 in Case F-107/06 Berrisford v Commission (not yet published in the ECR), seeking the setting aside of that judgment
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
dismisses the appeal; |
2. |
orders the Commission to bear its own cost and to pay those incurred by Mr Michael Berrisford in the present proceedings. |