Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62007TA0473

    Case T-473/07 P: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 April 2009 — Commission v Berrisford (Appeal — Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2005 promotion procedure — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Examination of comparative merits — Obligation to take into account the fact that the official concerned was included in the reserve)

    IO C 129, 6.6.2009, p. 13–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.6.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 129/13


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 April 2009 — Commission v Berrisford

    (Case T-473/07 P) (1)

    (Appeal - Staff cases - Officials - Promotion - 2005 promotion procedure - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Examination of comparative merits - Obligation to take into account the fact that the official concerned was included in the reserve)

    2009/C 129/22

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings: Michael Berrisford (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

    Re:

    Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 10 October 2007 in Case F-107/06 Berrisford v Commission (not yet published in the ECR), seeking the setting aside of that judgment

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    dismisses the appeal;

    2.

    orders the Commission to bear its own cost and to pay those incurred by Mr Michael Berrisford in the present proceedings.


    (1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.


    Top