Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62005FA0061

    Case F-61/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2008 — Dalmasso v Commission (Staff case — Contract staff — Recruitment — Grading in function group — Application for review of grade and remuneration set on recruitment — Former auxiliary staff member employed as contract staff member — Article 3a and Article 80(2) and (3) of the CEOS — Duties falling under different function groups — Equal treatment — Action unfounded)

    IO C 209, 15.8.2008, p. 68–68 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    15.8.2008   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 209/68


    Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 April 2008 — Dalmasso v Commission

    (Case F-61/05) (1)

    (Staff case - Contract staff - Recruitment - Grading in function group - Application for review of grade and remuneration set on recruitment - Former auxiliary staff member employed as contract staff member - Article 3a and Article 80(2) and (3) of the CEOS - Duties falling under different function groups - Equal treatment - Action unfounded)

    (2008/C 209/122)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Raffaelle Dalmasso (Schaerbeek, Belgium) (represented by: L.Vogel, lawyer)

    Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, agents)

    Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by M. Arpio Santacruz and I. Sulce, agents)

    Re:

    Staff case — First, annulment of the Commission's decision rejecting the complaint submitted by the applicant, a former member of the auxiliary staff, against the decision fixing his grade and remuneration as a contract staff member and, secondly, an application for damages (formerly T-269/05)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Tribunal:

    1.

    dismisses the action;

    2.

    orders each party to bear its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 229 of 17.9.2005, p. 30 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities as T-269/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal by order dated 15.12.2005).


    Top