21.1.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/50

1.

points out that restructuring and structural change are generally seen as an integral part of natural economic development;

2.

points out that the effects of restructuring are clearly felt at regional level. They can influence a region’s structural development and its competitiveness in the medium or even long term. In view of this, regional approaches are needed (decentralised policies taking local needs into account and implemented with the involvement of key partners) (1);

3.

points out that restructuring hits the less developed regions particularly hard, as they usually have a less competitive and innovative industrial fabric and high levels of unemployment, making it necessary to give special attention to this type of region;

4.

is therefore pleased that the Quality Framework acknowledges the shared responsibility of all stakeholders, including regional authorities. The Committee argues that this is also an issue of concern for local authorities, large cities in particular, which have the main concentrations of employers and play a key role in determining the economic situation of smaller urban centres in their catchment areas;

5.

notes that shared management is an essential prerequisite for the success of the proposed approaches. The EU, too, should support the strengthening of partnerships between all the important players. The State and regional/local authorities also have a key coordinating role to play, given that employees and employers often have different perspectives on restructuring processes;

6.

feels that in order to successfully implement the Europe 2020 strategy, it is essential in the current socioeconomic climate to focus all efforts on boosting employment (creating and maintaining jobs);

7.

attaches great importance to anticipating change and the adaptability of all stakeholders. There are three issues here:

8.

welcomes Commission-led initiatives such as the European Monitoring Centre on Change (EMCC) or the European Restructuring Monitor (ERM) (2) and proposes these be further strengthened with, for example, tailor-made consultancy for local and regional authorities in specific situations;

9.

also appreciates the focus in Eurofound research activity on the regional consequences of restructuring, thus effectively addressing the lack of information in this field over the last few years;

10.

welcomes the fact that the Commission lists in its communication the best practices that it suggests should be adopted on a voluntary basis. It further recommends that the Commission address the calls by the European Parliament and the Committee of the Regions (3) to revise the legislative framework on the information and consultation of workers in relation to anticipation and management of restructuring, the shortcomings of which the Commission discusses itself in this communication;

11.

recommends that the Commission cooperates with all interested stakeholders when evaluating Quality Framework implementation, while ensuring that this process also takes into account existing procedures or agreements between partners in each of the Member States;

12.

points out that the Commission’s proposed Quality Framework, comprising a set of recommendations and best practices, that the Commission recommends be adopted on a voluntary basis, makes no reference to a specific legal basis in the treaties and constitutes a sui generis legal instrument that is also not explicitly provided for in the treaties. As a result, the Commission’s approach does not allow the European Parliament to express a useful position. However, given that the Commission’s proposal is within the scope of the competences shared between the EU and the Member States regarding social policy, as set out in Articles 151 and 153 TFEU, and that exchanges of experience and best practices at EU level offer clear added value, the proposal appears to be consistent with the subsidiarity and proportionality principles;

13.

highlights the role that LRAs play in forecasting skills needs and matching them with labour market needs (4) through measures in the areas of education, training and support for young entrepreneurs in particular. The Member States should be aware of this role and provide LRAs with the right resources to facilitate the transition of young people from education into employment, since local authorities in particular often have a role as service providers in education, training and employment (5);

14.

reiterates the fact that issues such as professional mobility or balancing supply and demand on the labour market at local level have a critical impact on the effectiveness of restructuring mechanisms. Workers’ mobility should be fostered through the provision of personalised job-seeking services, work experience and training courses so they can adapt their skill set to the requirements of the labour market (6). This particularly applies to specific groups facing long-term unemployment (young people, low-skilled workers, older people, migrants and the disabled);

15.

for border regions, stresses the importance of promoting true cross-border labour mobility by removing barriers in labour law and social security (eradicating tax barriers, exporting unemployment benefits and making pension rights transferable) (7). LRAs can also play an important role in the field of advice for commuters using the EURES services or existing cross-border structures (8);

16.

encourages local authorities to cooperate more closely on exchanging information on job opportunities in a given local or regional labour market. Joint action to promote individual mobility and exchange labour market information could boost employment in occupations where there is high demand and a lack of training at local or regional level;

17.

welcomes the European Commission’s communication on a European Industrial Renaissance (COM(2014) 14) presented in January 2014 and invites the Commission to incorporate the anticipation of change and the management of restructuring as active measures to support broader European industrial policy. Structural changes have an impact on industry in regions and cities. We therefore think that any discussion of structural change must also tackle the role of industrial and regional policies in the anticipation of these changes;

18.

stresses the role of LRAs in the use of EU Structural Funds such as the ESF and the ERDF, as well as the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in relevant regions, to promote job creation and inclusive transitions. Funding for measures relating to the anticipation of change and restructuring should come from several different sources, in order to ensure continuity;

19.

underlines the importance of research and innovation strategies based on smart specialisation (RIS3) for enabling the changes prioritised by regions. By its very nature, an RIS3 is a process intended to achieve changes to the business environment first and foremost, helping regions to gain access to the best innovation skills and the best partners. The European cooperation emphasised in RIS3 processes adds considerable value to the implementation of structural changes;

20.

feels that the most important role for LRAs in restructuring is coordinating all the stakeholders. In practice, permanent coordination structures have proven crucial in ensuring rapid and effective responses at regional level;

21.

endorses the EESC’s call for closer coordination and cooperation at EU level between Commission policies and services, agencies and the numerous observatories, so that companies that are restructuring receive clear, consistent support in their decision-making. In particular, suitable and specific support and mentoring systems should be available to SMEs and micro businesses to help them with planning ahead for restructuring (9).