This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52013TA1213(14)
Report on the annual accounts of the European Chemicals Agency for the financial year 2012, together with the Agency’s replies
Report on the annual accounts of the European Chemicals Agency for the financial year 2012, together with the Agency’s replies
Report on the annual accounts of the European Chemicals Agency for the financial year 2012, together with the Agency’s replies
IO C 365, 13.12.2013, p. 97–105
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
13.12.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 365/97 |
REPORT
on the annual accounts of the European Chemicals Agency for the financial year 2012, together with the Agency’s replies
2013/C 365/14
INTRODUCTION
1. |
The European Chemicals Agency (hereinafter ‘the Agency’, aka ‘ECHA’), which is located in Helsinki, was set up by Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1). Its main tasks are to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment as well as the free movement of substances on the internal market while enhancing competitiveness and innovation. The Agency also promotes the development of alternative methods for the assessment of hazards relating to substances (2). |
INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE STATEMENT OF ASSURANCE
2. |
The audit approach taken by the Court comprises analytical audit procedures, direct testing of transactions and an assessment of key controls of the Agency’s supervisory and control systems. This is supplemented by evidence provided by the work of other auditors (where relevant) and an analysis of management representations. |
STATEMENT OF ASSURANCE
3. |
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
|
The management’s responsibility
4. |
In accordance with Articles 33 and 43 of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 (5), the management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the annual accounts of the Agency and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions:
|
The auditor’s responsibility
5. |
The Court’s responsibility is, on the basis of its audit, to provide the European Parliament and the Council (7) with a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. The Court conducts its audit in accordance with the IFAC International Standards on Auditing and Codes of Ethics and the INTOSAI International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions. These standards require the Court to plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the annual accounts of the Agency are free from material misstatement and the transactions underlying them are legal and regular. |
6. |
The audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, which is based on an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the accounts and material non-compliance by the underlying transactions with the requirements in the legal framework of the European Union, whether due to fraud or error. In assessing these risks, the auditor considers any internal controls relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the accounts, as well as the supervisory and control systems that are implemented to ensure the legality and regularity of underlying transactions, and designs audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. The audit also entails evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies, the reasonableness of accounting estimates and the overall presentation of the accounts. |
7. |
The Court considers that the audit evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for its statement of assurance. |
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts
8. |
In the Court’s opinion, the Agency’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer. |
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts
9. |
In the Court’s opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2012 are legal and regular in all material respects. |
10. |
The comments which follow do not call the Court’s opinions into question. |
COMMENTS ON INTERNAL CONTROLS
11. |
Physical inventory results show serious weaknesses in the safeguarding and tracking of fixed assets. There is no tracking procedure for software and internal components (2 370 items out of the 5 878 ICT fixed assets recorded). In addition, 306 items could not be found, of which 93 laptops and 29 computers. |
COMMENTS ON BUDGETARY MANAGEMENT
12. |
Budget implementation rates for the year 2012 were satisfactory for titles I and II. While the rate of committed appropriations carried over was high for title III at 50 % (11,3 million euro), this primarily relates to the multiannual nature of significant IT development projects (3,7 million euro), substance evaluations with an annual regulatory deadline set at February N+1 (1,8 million euro), translations not yet delivered by year-end (1,3 million euro) and the start of two new activities Biocides (1,2 million euro) and PIC (1,3 million euro) in the second half of the year. |
FOLLOW-UP OF PREVIOUS YEAR’S COMMENTS
13. |
An overview of the corrective actions taken in response to the Court’s previous year’s comments is provided in Annex I. |
This Report was adopted by Chamber IV, headed by Dr Louis GALEA, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 9 July 2013.
For the Court of Auditors
Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA
President
(1) OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.
(2) Annex II summarises the Agency's competences and activities. It is presented for information purposes.
(3) These include the balance sheet and the economic outturn account, the cash flow table, the statement of changes in net assets and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory notes.
(4) These comprise the budgetary outturn account and the annex to the budgetary outturn account.
(5) OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.
(6) The accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer are derived from the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) issued by the International Federation of Accountants or, where relevant, the International Accounting Standards (IAS)/International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
(7) Article 185(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1).
ANNEX I
Follow-up of previous year’s comments
Year |
Court’s comment |
Status of corrective action (Completed / Ongoing / Outstanding / N/A) |
2011 |
The Agency’s 2011 budget amounted to 93,2 million euro, of which 14,9 million euro (16 %) were carried over to 2012. Carry-overs related to title III (operational expenditure) amounted to 11,5 million euro (55 %). The level of carry-overs is excessive and at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality. |
Ongoing |
2011 |
The results of the latest physical inventory carried out in 2011 show several shortcomings, notably as regards the low proportion of ICT assets checked in terms of value. No formal policy on the inventory of fixed assets is in place. |
Ongoing |
2011 |
The Agency records costs related to ICT projects that are already in use as expenditure instead of recognising them as fixed assets. |
Completed |
2011 |
The Court identified shortcomings in the recruitment procedures. There is no evidence that thresholds for passing the various stages of the procedures or questions for interviews or written tests were set before the examination of applications. Declarations of interests were inadequate to detect and prevent conflict of interests of members of the selection board. In one case the selection procedure was irregular since the agent was recruited for a post different from the one published. |
Completed |
ANNEX II
European Chemicals Agency (Helsinki)
Competencies and activities
Areas of Union competence deriving from the Treaty |
Collection of information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competences of the Agency (as defined in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (REACH Regulation), Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures), Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Biocidal Products Regulation) and Regulation (EU)No 649/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Prior informed consent) |
Objectives
Tasks
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Governance |
Management Board One representative of each Member State appointed by the Council and a maximum of six representatives appointed by the Commission, including three individuals from interested parties without voting rights and, in addition, two independent persons appointed by the European Parliament. (Article 79 of the REACH Regulation). Tasks Article 78 of the REACH Regulation and framework financial regulation for agencies, mainly adopting annual and multiannual work programmes, the final budget, a general report, internal rules of procedures and the appointment of and disciplinary authority over the Executive Director. In addition, the appointment of the Board of Appeal and Committee members. Executive Director Tasks Article 83 of the REACH Regulation. Committees The Agency comprises three Scientific Committees (Risk Assessment, Member States and Socio-Economic Analysis). Tasks Article 76(1)(c-e) of the REACH Regulation. Forum for Exchange of Information on Enforcement Tasks Article 76(1)(f) of the REACH Regulation. Secretariat Tasks Article 76(1)(g) of the REACH Regulation. Board of Appeal Tasks Article 76(1)(h) of the REACH Regulation. External audit European Court of Auditors. Internal audit European Commission’s Internal Audit Service (IAS). Discharge authority European Parliament, upon recommendation from the Council (Article 97(10) of REACH Regulation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resources made available to the Agency in 2012 (2011) |
Budget (including amending budgets)
Staff at 31 December 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Activities and services provided 2012 (2011) |
ECHA’s Work Programme was divided into the following 16 Activities: Registration, Pre-registration and Data-sharing
Evaluation
Risk Management
Classification and Labelling (C&L)
Advice and assistance
Scientific IT Tools
Scientific and Technical Advice to EU institutions and bodies
Committees and Forum
Board of Appeal
Communication
International Cooperation
Management
Finance, Procurement and Accounting
Human resources and corporate services
Information and Communication Technology
Biocides
PIC
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source: Information supplied by the Agency. |
THE AGENCY’S REPLIES
11. |
A new feature/version for ABAC Assets (v. 2.7.2.) was deployed in July 2012 and which allows for better tracking of internal components that cannot be physically accessed. However, this process requires considerable manual work, and could not be completed for the 2012 asset inventory exercise. The Agency confirms that the asset inventory management will be reinforced. The physical inventory check will therefore be done earlier in 2013 in order to allow for sufficient analysis and complete tracking of all assets. Meanwhile, a project has already been initiated for establishing a software system for licence management that will enable the appropriate follow-up of the intangible assets. |
12. |
The Agency appreciates the above conclusion from the Court and will continue to be attentive to ensure justification for carry-over operations in Title III. |