This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 32015D0348
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 of 2 March 2015 concerning the consistency of certain targets included in the national or functional airspace block plans submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period (notified under document C(2015) 1293) Text with EEA relevance
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 of 2 March 2015 concerning the consistency of certain targets included in the national or functional airspace block plans submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period (notified under document C(2015) 1293) Text with EEA relevance
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 of 2 March 2015 concerning the consistency of certain targets included in the national or functional airspace block plans submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period (notified under document C(2015) 1293) Text with EEA relevance
IO L 60, 4.3.2015, p. 55–67
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
In force
|
4.3.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 60/55 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2015/348
of 2 March 2015
concerning the consistency of certain targets included in the national or functional airspace block plans submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period
(notified under document C(2015) 1293)
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the single European sky (the framework Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 11(3)(c) thereof,
Whereas:
|
(1) |
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, the Member States are to adopt national or functional airspace block (‘FAB’) plans, including binding national targets or targets at the level of FABs, ensuring consistency with the Union-wide performance targets. That Regulation also provides that the Commission is to assess the consistency of those targets on the basis of the assessment criteria referred to in point (d) of its Article 11(6) and that the Commission may decide to issue recommendations in case it identifies that those criteria have not been met. Detailed rules in this regard have been set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 (2). |
|
(2) |
Union-wide performance targets in the key performance areas of safety, environment, capacity and cost-efficiency for the second reference period (2015-2019) were adopted by Commission Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU (3). |
|
(3) |
The Member States submitted to the Commission the performance plans, all at FAB level, by 1 July 2014. In a number of cases the initial submission was in a draft form only. Furthermore, a number of plans were subsequently modified by addenda or corrigenda, the latest one dated 9 January 2015. For its assessment, the Commission has based itself on the most recent information submitted. |
|
(4) |
The Performance Review Body, which is charged with assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 3 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013, submitted an initial assessment report to the Commission on 7 October 2014 and an updated version of that report on 15 December 2014. The Commission further received from the Performance Review Body reports based on information from national supervisory authorities on the monitoring of the performance plans and targets submitted in accordance with Article 18(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013. |
|
(5) |
Concerning the key performance area of safety, the consistency of the targets submitted by the Member States regarding the effectiveness of safety management and the application of severity classification on the basis of the Risk Analysis Tool (RAT) methodology has been assessed, in accordance with the principles laid down in point 2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013. That assessment has demonstrated that the targets submitted by all Member States, as regards FABCE, UK-IR FAB, FABEC, Baltic FAB, Blue Med FAB, Danube FAB, DK-SE FAB, NEFAB and SW FAB, are consistent with the relevant Union-wide performance target. |
|
(6) |
Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by the Member States has been assessed, in accordance with the principles laid down in point 3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013, by using the respective FAB reference values for horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory that, when applied, ensure at Union level that the Union-wide performance target is met, calculated by the Network Manager and set out in the Network Operations Plan (2014-2018/2019) in its most recent version of June 2014 (‘Network Operations Plan’). That assessment has demonstrated that the targets submitted by all Member States, as regards FABCE, UK-IR FAB, FABEC, Baltic FAB, Blue Med FAB, Danube FAB, DK-SE FAB, NEFAB and SW FAB, are consistent with the relevant Union-wide performance target. |
|
(7) |
Concerning the key performance area of capacity, the consistency of the targets submitted by the Member States for en route Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay has been assessed, in accordance with the principles laid down in point 4 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013, by using the respective FAB reference values for capacity that, when applied, ensure at Union level that the Union-wide performance target is met, calculated by the Network Manager and set out in the Network Operations Plan. That assessment has demonstrated that the targets submitted by the United Kingdom and Ireland as regards UK-IR FAB, by Poland and Lithuania as regards Baltic FAB, by Denmark and Sweden as regards DK-SE FAB and by Estonia, Finland and Latvia as regards NEFAB are consistent with the relevant Union-wide performance target. |
|
(8) |
Concerning the key performance area of cost-efficiency, the targets expressed in en route determined unit costs submitted by the Member States have been assessed, in accordance with the principles laid down in point 5, in conjunction with point 1, of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013, by taking account of the trend of en route determined unit costs over the second reference period and the combined period of the first and the second reference period (2012-2019), the number of service units (traffic forecast) and the level of en route determined unit costs in comparison to Member States having a similar operational and economic environment. That assessment has demonstrated that the targets submitted by the United Kingdom and Ireland as regards UK-IR FAB, by Poland and Lithuania as regards Baltic FAB, by Cyprus, Greece and Malta as regards Blue Med FAB, by Bulgaria and Romania as regards Danube FAB, by Croatia, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Hungary as regards FABCE, by Portugal and Spain for Spain Continental and Spain Canarias charging zones as regards FAB SW, by Denmark and Sweden as regards DK-SE FAB and by Estonia, Finland and Latvia as regards NEFAB are consistent with the relevant Union-wide performance target. |
|
(9) |
Therefore, the Commission considers that the targets included in the performance plans drawn up by the United Kingdom and Ireland as regards the UK-IR FAB, by Denmark and Sweden as regards the DK-SE FAB, by Poland and Lithuania, as regards the Baltic FAB and by Estonia, Finland and Latvia as regards NEFAB are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in all four key performance areas. The Commission further considers that the targets submitted by Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Germany and the Netherlands as regards FABEC, by Austria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia as regards FABCE, by Cyprus, Greece, Italy and Malta as regards Blue Med FAB, Bulgaria and Romania as regards Danube FAB and by Portugal and Spain as regards SW FAB are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance areas of safety and environment. The Commission also considers that the targets submitted by Cyprus, Greece and Malta as regards Blue Med FAB, by Bulgaria and Romania as regards the Danube FAB, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Hungary as regards the FAB CE and Portugal and Spain as regards the SW FAB are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance areas of cost-efficiency. Therefore, in relation to all those targets there is no need to issue recommendations that the national supervisory authorities concerned propose revised targets. With respect to the targets submitted by those Member States that are not consistent with the relevant Union-wide performance targets, the Commission has issued such recommendations, as set out in the Commission Implementing Decision concerning inconsistency of targets C(2015) 1263. |
|
(10) |
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Single Sky Committee, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The targets included in the performance plans submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, listed in the Annex, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period set out in Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU.
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 2 March 2015.
For the Commission
Violeta BULC
Member of the Commission
(2) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 of 3 May 2013 laying down a performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions (OJ L 128, 9.5.2013, p. 1).
(3) Commission Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU of 11 March 2014 setting the Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network and alert thresholds for the second reference period 2015-19 (OJ L 71, 12.3.2014, p. 20).
ANNEX
Performance targets in the key performance areas of safety, environment, capacity and cost-efficiency included in the national or functional airspace block plans submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF SAFETY
Effectiveness of Safety Management (EOSM) and the application of the severity classification based on the Risk Analysis Tool (RAT) methodology
|
MEMBER STATE |
FAB |
EOSM |
ATM Ground Level % (RAT) |
ATM overall Level % (RAT) |
||||||||||||
|
|
STATE Level |
ANSP Level |
2017 |
2019 |
2017 |
2019 |
||||||||||
|
|
SC |
Other MO |
SMI |
RI's |
ATM-S |
SMI |
RI's |
ATM-S |
SMI |
RI's |
ATM-S |
SMI |
RI's |
ATM-S |
||
|
Austria |
FABCE |
C |
D |
D |
94,17 |
93,33 |
80 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
100 |
|
Croatia |
||||||||||||||||
|
Czech Republic |
||||||||||||||||
|
Hungary |
||||||||||||||||
|
Slovakia |
||||||||||||||||
|
Slovenia |
||||||||||||||||
|
Ireland |
UK-IR |
C |
C |
D |
80 |
80 |
80 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
100 |
|
United Kingdom |
||||||||||||||||
|
Belgium/Luxembourg |
FABEC |
C |
C |
D |
≥ 80 |
≥ 80 |
≥ 80 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
≥ 80 |
≥ 80 |
≥ 80 |
≥ 80 |
≥ 80 |
100 |
|
France |
||||||||||||||||
|
Germany |
||||||||||||||||
|
The Netherlands |
||||||||||||||||
|
[Switzerland] |
||||||||||||||||
|
Poland |
Baltic |
C |
C |
D |
≥ 80 |
≥ 80 |
≥ 80 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
≥ 80 |
≥ 80 |
≥ 80 |
90 |
90 |
100 |
|
Lithuania |
||||||||||||||||
|
Cyprus |
Blue Med |
C |
C |
D |
80 |
80 |
80 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
95 |
95 |
100 |
|
Greece |
||||||||||||||||
|
Italy |
||||||||||||||||
|
Malta |
||||||||||||||||
|
Bulgaria |
Danube |
C |
C |
D |
90 |
90 |
80 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
80 |
85 |
80 |
90 |
90 |
100 |
|
Romania |
||||||||||||||||
|
Denmark |
DK-SE |
C |
C |
D |
80 |
80 |
80 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
100 |
|
Sweden |
||||||||||||||||
|
Estonia |
NEFAB |
C |
C |
D |
95 |
95 |
85 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
90 |
90 |
85 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
Finland |
||||||||||||||||
|
Latvia |
||||||||||||||||
|
[Norway] |
||||||||||||||||
|
Portugal |
SW |
C |
D |
D |
90 |
90 |
90 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
80 |
80 |
90 |
80 |
80 |
100 |
|
Spain |
||||||||||||||||
Abbreviations:
|
‘SC’ |
: |
Management objective ‘safety culture’ as referred to in point 1.1(a) of section 2 of Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 |
|
‘other MO’ |
: |
Management objectives as listed in point 1.1(a) of section 2 of Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 other than ‘safety culture’ |
|
‘RIs’ |
: |
Runway incursions |
|
‘SMI’ |
: |
Separation minima infringements |
|
‘ATM-S’ |
: |
ATM-specific occurrences |
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF ENVIRONMENT
Horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory
|
MEMBER STATE |
FAB |
FAB TARGET ENVIRONMENT (%) |
|
2019 |
||
|
Austria |
FABCE |
1,81 |
|
Croatia |
||
|
Czech Republic |
||
|
Hungary |
||
|
Slovakia |
||
|
Slovenia |
||
|
Ireland |
UK-IR |
2,99 |
|
United Kingdom |
||
|
Belgium/Luxembourg |
FABEC |
2,96 |
|
France |
||
|
Germany |
||
|
The Netherlands |
||
|
[Switzerland] |
||
|
Poland |
Baltic |
1,36 |
|
Lithuania |
||
|
Cyprus |
Blue Med |
2,45 |
|
Greece |
||
|
Italy |
||
|
Malta |
||
|
Bulgaria |
Danube |
1,37 |
|
Romania |
||
|
Denmark |
DK-SE |
1,19 |
|
Sweden |
||
|
Estonia |
NEFAB |
1,22 |
|
Finland |
||
|
Latvia |
||
|
[Norway] |
||
|
Portugal |
SW |
3,28 |
|
Spain |
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY
En route Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay in min/flight
|
MEMBER STATE |
FAB |
FAB TARGET EN-ROUTE CAPACITY |
||||
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
||
|
Ireland |
UK-IR |
0,25 |
0,26 |
0,26 |
0,26 |
0,26 |
|
United Kingdom |
||||||
|
Poland |
Baltic |
0,21 |
0,21 |
0,21 |
0,22 |
0,22 |
|
Lithuania |
||||||
|
Denmark |
DK-SE |
0,10 |
0,10 |
0,10 |
0,09 |
0,09 |
|
Sweden |
||||||
|
Estonia |
NEFAB |
0,12 |
0,12 |
0,13 |
0,13 |
0,13 |
|
Finland |
||||||
|
Latvia |
||||||
|
[Norway] |
||||||
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY
Legend:
|
Key |
Item |
Units |
|
(A) |
Total En-route Determined Costs |
(in nominal terms and in national currency) |
|
(B) |
Inflation rate |
(%) |
|
(C) |
Inflation index |
(100 = 2009) |
|
(D) |
Total En-route Determined Costs |
(in real 2009 prices and in national currency) |
|
(E) |
Total En-route Services Units |
(TSUs) |
|
(F) |
En-route Determined Unit Cost (DUC) |
(in real 2009 prices and in national currency) |
BALTIC FAB
Charging Zone: Lithuania — Currency: EUR
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
23 316 993 |
23 342 321 |
24 186 978 |
25 093 574 |
25 748 766 |
|
(B) |
1,7 % |
2,2 % |
2,5 % |
2,2 % |
2,2 % |
|
(C) |
112,9 |
115,4 |
118,4 |
121,0 |
123,7 |
|
(D) |
20 652 919 |
20 223 855 |
20 434 886 |
20 737 566 |
20 814 037 |
|
(E) |
490 928 |
508 601 |
524 877 |
541 672 |
559 548 |
|
(F) |
42,07 |
39,76 |
38,93 |
38,28 |
37,20 |
Charging Zone: Poland — Currency: PLN
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
658 592 342 |
687 375 337 |
713 570 963 |
730 747 925 |
749 146 920 |
|
(B) |
2,4 % |
2,5 % |
2,5 % |
2,5 % |
2,5 % |
|
(C) |
115,9 |
118,7 |
121,7 |
124,8 |
127,9 |
|
(D) |
568 474 758 |
578 848 069 |
586 251 473 |
585 720 606 |
585 822 496 |
|
(E) |
4 362 840 |
4 544 000 |
4 699 000 |
4 861 000 |
5 039 000 |
|
(F) |
130,30 |
127,39 |
124,76 |
120,49 |
116,26 |
BLUE MED FAB
Charging Zone: Cyprus — Currency: EUR
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
52 708 045 |
53 598 493 |
55 916 691 |
57 610 277 |
59 360 816 |
|
(B) |
1,6 % |
1,7 % |
1,7 % |
1,8 % |
2,0 % |
|
(C) |
112,9 |
114,8 |
116,8 |
118,9 |
121,3 |
|
(D) |
46 681 639 |
46 676 772 |
47 881 610 |
48 459 560 |
48 952 987 |
|
(E) |
1 395 081 |
1 425 773 |
1 457 140 |
1 489 197 |
1 521 959 |
|
(F) |
33,46 |
32,74 |
32,86 |
32,54 |
32,16 |
Charging Zone: Greece — Currency: EUR
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
147 841 464 |
151 226 557 |
155 317 991 |
156 939 780 |
164 629 376 |
|
(B) |
0,3 % |
1,1 % |
1,2 % |
1,3 % |
1,6 % |
|
(C) |
107,9 |
109,1 |
110,4 |
111,8 |
113,6 |
|
(D) |
136 958 572 |
138 630 543 |
140 635 901 |
140 350 008 |
144 936 752 |
|
(E) |
4 231 888 |
4 318 281 |
4 404 929 |
4 492 622 |
4 599 834 |
|
(F) |
32,36 |
32,10 |
31,93 |
31,24 |
31,51 |
Charging Zone: Malta — Currency: EUR
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
17 736 060 |
19 082 057 |
20 694 940 |
21 720 523 |
22 752 314 |
|
(B) |
1,7 % |
1,8 % |
1,7 % |
1,7 % |
1,7 % |
|
(C) |
111,9 |
114,0 |
115,9 |
117,9 |
119,9 |
|
(D) |
15 844 908 |
16 745 957 |
17 857 802 |
18 429 483 |
18 982 242 |
|
(E) |
609 000 |
621 000 |
634 000 |
653 000 |
672 000 |
|
(F) |
26,02 |
26,97 |
28,17 |
28,22 |
28,25 |
DANUBE FAB
Charging Zone: Bulgaria — Currency: BGN
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
166 771 377 |
172 805 739 |
178 045 986 |
181 582 049 |
184 412 180 |
|
(B) |
0,9 % |
1,8 % |
2,2 % |
2,2 % |
2,2 % |
|
(C) |
110,1 |
112,1 |
114,5 |
117,0 |
119,6 |
|
(D) |
151 495 007 |
154 219 178 |
155 475 340 |
155 149 844 |
154 176 130 |
|
(E) |
2 627 000 |
2 667 000 |
2 903 000 |
2 984 837 |
3 090 000 |
|
(F) |
57,67 |
57,82 |
53,56 |
51,98 |
49,90 |
Charging Zone: Romania — Currency: RON
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
690 507 397 |
704 650 329 |
718 659 958 |
735 119 853 |
753 216 461 |
|
(B) |
3,1 % |
3,0 % |
2,8 % |
2,8 % |
2,7 % |
|
(C) |
126,9 |
130,7 |
134,4 |
138,2 |
141,9 |
|
(D) |
543 963 841 |
538 937 162 |
534 681 066 |
532 030 334 |
530 795 951 |
|
(E) |
4 012 887 |
4 117 019 |
4 219 063 |
4 317 155 |
4 441 542 |
|
(F) |
135,55 |
130,90 |
126,73 |
123,24 |
119,51 |
DENMARK-SWEDEN FAB
Charging Zone: Denmark — Currency: DKK
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
726 872 134 |
724 495 393 |
735 983 926 |
749 032 040 |
750 157 741 |
|
(B) |
1,8 % |
2,2 % |
2,2 % |
2,2 % |
2,2 % |
|
(C) |
111,6 |
114,1 |
116,6 |
119,1 |
121,8 |
|
(D) |
651 263 654 |
635 160 606 |
631 342 985 |
628 704 443 |
616 095 213 |
|
(E) |
1 553 000 |
1 571 000 |
1 589 000 |
1 608 000 |
1 628 000 |
|
(F) |
419,36 |
404,30 |
397,32 |
390,99 |
378,44 |
Charging Zone: Sweden — Currency: SEK
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
1 951 544 485 |
1 974 263 091 |
1 970 314 688 |
1 964 628 986 |
1 958 887 595 |
|
(B) |
1,6 % |
2,4 % |
2,1 % |
2,0 % |
2,0 % |
|
(C) |
106,1 |
108,6 |
110,9 |
113,1 |
115,4 |
|
(D) |
1 840 204 091 |
1 817 994 673 |
1 777 040 937 |
1 737 169 570 |
1 698 130 296 |
|
(E) |
3 257 000 |
3 303 000 |
3 341 000 |
3 383 000 |
3 425 000 |
|
(F) |
565,00 |
550,41 |
531,89 |
513,50 |
495,80 |
FABCE
Charging Zone: Croatia — Currency: HRK
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
670 066 531 |
687 516 987 |
691 440 691 |
687 394 177 |
674 346 800 |
|
(B) |
0,2 % |
1,0 % |
1,5 % |
2,5 % |
2,5 % |
|
(C) |
109,2 |
110,4 |
112,0 |
114,8 |
117,7 |
|
(D) |
613 414 184 |
622 991 131 |
617 287 272 |
598 707 050 |
573 017 597 |
|
(E) |
1 763 000 |
1 783 000 |
1 808 000 |
1 863 185 |
1 926 787 |
|
(F) |
347,94 |
349,41 |
341,42 |
321,34 |
297,40 |
Charging Zone: Czech Republic — Currency: CZK
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
3 022 287 900 |
3 087 882 700 |
3 126 037 100 |
3 149 817 800 |
3 102 014 900 |
|
(B) |
1,9 % |
2,0 % |
2,0 % |
2,0 % |
2,0 % |
|
(C) |
111,5 |
113,7 |
116,0 |
118,3 |
120,7 |
|
(D) |
2 710 775 667 |
2 715 303 433 |
2 694 955 079 |
2 662 212 166 |
2 570 401 338 |
|
(E) |
2 548 000 |
2 637 000 |
2 717 000 |
2 795 000 |
2 881 000 |
|
(F) |
1 063,88 |
1 029,69 |
991,89 |
952,49 |
892,19 |
Charging Zone: Hungary — Currency: HUF
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
28 133 097 383 |
29 114 984 951 |
29 632 945 277 |
30 406 204 408 |
31 345 254 629 |
|
(B) |
1,8 % |
3,0 % |
3,0 % |
3,0 % |
3,0 % |
|
(C) |
119,3 |
122,8 |
126,5 |
130,3 |
134,2 |
|
(D) |
23 587 547 923 |
23 699 795 100 |
23 418 852 735 |
23 330 056 076 |
23 350 067 982 |
|
(E) |
2 457 201 |
2 364 165 |
2 413 812 |
2 453 639 |
2 512 526 |
|
(F) |
9 599,36 |
10 024,60 |
9 702,02 |
9 508,35 |
9 293,46 |
Charging Zone: Slovenia — Currency: EUR
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
32 094 283 |
33 168 798 |
33 870 218 |
34 392 801 |
35 029 005 |
|
(B) |
1,6 % |
2,1 % |
1,9 % |
2,0 % |
2,0 % |
|
(C) |
111,9 |
114,3 |
116,5 |
118,8 |
121,2 |
|
(D) |
28 675 840 |
29 018 678 |
29 079 819 |
28 949 500 |
28 906 876 |
|
(E) |
481 500 |
499 637 |
514 217 |
529 770 |
546 470 |
|
(F) |
59,56 |
58,08 |
56,55 |
54,65 |
52,90 |
NEFAB
Charging Zone: Estonia — Currency: EUR
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
23 098 175 |
24 757 151 |
25 985 553 |
27 073 003 |
28 182 980 |
|
(B) |
3,0 % |
3,1 % |
3,0 % |
3,0 % |
3,0 % |
|
(C) |
123,3 |
127,1 |
130,9 |
134,8 |
138,9 |
|
(D) |
18 739 585 |
19 481 586 |
19 852 645 |
20 081 013 |
20 295 459 |
|
(E) |
774 641 |
801 575 |
827 117 |
855 350 |
885 643 |
|
(F) |
24,19 |
24,30 |
24,00 |
23,48 |
22,92 |
Charging Zone: Finland — Currency: EUR
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
45 050 000 |
45 596 000 |
46 064 000 |
46 321 000 |
46 468 000 |
|
(B) |
1,5 % |
1,7 % |
1,9 % |
2,0 % |
2,0 % |
|
(C) |
114,4 |
116,4 |
118,6 |
121,0 |
123,4 |
|
(D) |
39 368 663 |
39 179 750 |
38 843 860 |
38 294 684 |
37 662 953 |
|
(E) |
792 600 |
812 000 |
827 000 |
843 000 |
861 000 |
|
(F) |
49,67 |
48,25 |
46,97 |
45,43 |
43,74 |
Charging Zone: Latvia — Currency: EUR
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
22 680 662 |
23 118 000 |
23 902 000 |
24 692 818 |
25 534 000 |
|
(B) |
2,5 % |
2,3 % |
2,3 % |
2,3 % |
2,3 % |
|
(C) |
109,7 |
112,2 |
114,8 |
117,4 |
120,1 |
|
(D) |
20 683 885 |
20 603 685 |
20 823 477 |
21 028 777 |
21 256 247 |
|
(E) |
802 000 |
824 000 |
844 000 |
867 000 |
890 000 |
|
(F) |
25,79 |
25,00 |
24,67 |
24,25 |
23,88 |
SW FAB
Charging Zone: Portugal — Currency: EUR
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
111 331 252 |
117 112 878 |
121 117 127 |
124 427 807 |
127 871 286 |
|
(B) |
1,2 % |
1,5 % |
1,5 % |
1,5 % |
1,5 % |
|
(C) |
110,5 |
112,2 |
113,8 |
115,5 |
117,3 |
|
(D) |
100 758 704 |
104 424 905 |
106 399 345 |
107 692 336 |
109 037 112 |
|
(E) |
3 095 250 |
3 104 536 |
3 122 232 |
3 147 209 |
3 171 128 |
|
(F) |
32,55 |
33,64 |
34,08 |
34,22 |
34,38 |
SPAIN
Charging Zone: Spain Continental — Currency: EUR
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
620 443 569 |
622 072 583 |
622 240 962 |
625 580 952 |
627 777 294 |
|
(B) |
0,8 % |
0,9 % |
1,0 % |
1,0 % |
1,1 % |
|
(C) |
110,6 |
111,6 |
112,7 |
113,9 |
115,1 |
|
(D) |
561 172 369 |
557 638 172 |
552 025 959 |
549 379 889 |
545 563 910 |
|
(E) |
8 880 000 |
8 936 000 |
9 018 000 |
9 128 000 |
9 238 000 |
|
(F) |
63,20 |
62,40 |
61,21 |
60,19 |
59,06 |
Charging Zone: Spain Canarias — Currency: EUR
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
98 528 223 |
98 750 683 |
99 003 882 |
98 495 359 |
98 326 935 |
|
(B) |
0,8 % |
0,9 % |
1,0 % |
1,0 % |
1,1 % |
|
(C) |
110,6 |
111,6 |
112,7 |
113,9 |
115,1 |
|
(D) |
89 115 786 |
88 522 066 |
87 832 072 |
86 497 790 |
85 450 091 |
|
(E) |
1 531 000 |
1 528 000 |
1 531 000 |
1 537 000 |
1 543 000 |
|
(F) |
58,21 |
57,93 |
57,37 |
56,28 |
55,38 |
UK-IR FAB
Charging Zone: Ireland — Currency: EUR
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
118 046 200 |
121 386 700 |
125 595 100 |
129 364 400 |
130 778 800 |
|
(B) |
1,1 % |
1,2 % |
1,4 % |
1,7 % |
1,7 % |
|
(C) |
103,7 |
105,0 |
106,4 |
108,2 |
110,1 |
|
(D) |
113 811 728 |
115 644 664 |
118 001 964 |
119 511 684 |
118 798 780 |
|
(E) |
4 000 000 |
4 049 624 |
4 113 288 |
4 184 878 |
4 262 135 |
|
(F) |
28,45 |
28,56 |
28,69 |
28,56 |
27,87 |
Charging Zone: United Kingdom — Currency: GBP
|
|
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
|
(A) |
686 348 218 |
687 119 724 |
690 004 230 |
682 569 359 |
673 089 111 |
|
(B) |
1,9 % |
1,9 % |
2,0 % |
2,0 % |
2,0 % |
|
(C) |
118,2 |
120,5 |
122,9 |
125,3 |
127,8 |
|
(D) |
580 582 809 |
570 397 867 |
561 561 156 |
544 617 914 |
526 523 219 |
|
(E) |
10 244 000 |
10 435 000 |
10 583 000 |
10 758 000 |
10 940 000 |
|
(F) |
56,68 |
54,66 |
53,06 |
50,62 |
48,13 |